There Is No Clinical and Radiological Difference between Suspensory and Cortical Button Fixation at the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear
Özet
Purpose of the study The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the two surgical techniques; (Transosseous Fixation with the Suspensory Fixation System technique and Pull Out Suture Repair) for clinical and radio-logic scores and to investigate the effects on meniscal extrusion in Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear(MMPRT). Material and Methods This was a prospective single-center study. Patients undergoing MMPRT were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients were repaired with Transosseous Fixation with The Suspensory Fixation System technique while Group 2 patients were repaired with Pull Out Suture Repair with Cortical Button. Lysholm and Tegner Score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), meniscus extrusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and K-L grade were recorded preop and postop at minimum one yearfollow-up. Results Meniscal extrusion on MRI increased in both groups at 12 months postoperatively compared to preoperative evaluation, but this increase was not statistically significant in both methods (Group 1: p = 0.670, Group 2: p = 0.211). There was no statistically significant difference in the pre-postoperative change in Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score and meniscal extrusion on MRI in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p = 0.575, p = 0.257 and, p = 0.141 respectively). Both Lysholm Knee Score (Group 1: p = 0.001, Group 2: p = 0.001) and Tegner Activity Score (Group 1: p = 0.008, Group 2: p < 0.001) increased statistically significantly at 12 months postoperatively compared to preoperative evaluation in Group 1 and Group 2. No patient in either group underwent total knee arthroplasty(TKA)at one-year follow-up. Conclusions The Suspensory Fixation System technique in MMPRT repair has been shown to be a feasible treatment method with similar functional and radiologic results compared to Pull Out Suture Repair with Cortical Button. At short-term follow up, the addition of a suspensory device to the conventional transtibial pullout repair did not result in a statistical difference on meniscal extrusion on MRI.
Atıf için künye
Sarikaya, G., Paksoy, A. E., Karasahin, O., Kose, M., Ollivier, M. P., & KOCAOĞLU, B. (2026). There Is No Clinical and Radiological Difference between Suspensory and Cortical Button Fixation at the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear. ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 93(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2026/001
BibTeX
@article{sarikaya2026-218760,
author = {Sarikaya, Gunes and Paksoy, Ahmet Emre and Karasahin, Omer and Kose, Mehmet and Ollivier, Matthie P. and KOCAOĞLU, Barış},
title = {There Is No Clinical and Radiological Difference between Suspensory and Cortical Button Fixation at the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear},
journal = {ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA},
year = {2026},
volume = {93},
number = {1},
pages = {53--58},
issn = {0001-5415},
doi = {10.55095/achot2026/001},
url = {https://akademik.atauni.edu.tr/yayinlar/218760-there-is-no-clinical-and-radiological-difference-between-suspensory-and-cortical}
}