Atatürk Üniversitesi Atatürk Üniversitesi
Ara
Yayınlara dön
Makale Kısa Makale Uluslararası 2002

Reply to "Comment on 'Coster-Kronig L-shell yield f(23) of Dy, W, and Bi' "

Önder Şimşek, Mehmet ERTUĞRUL

PHYSICAL REVIEW A Cilt 65 · Sayı 3 · 01.03.2002
DOI ile aç

Özet

In the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. A 65, 036501 (2002)], Kumar et al. claim that f(23) values obtained by Simsek [Phys. Rev. A 62, 052517 (2000)] for Dy, W, and Bi must be associated with an enormously large error. For this reason, we have rechecked all the calculations used to obtain the f(23) yield. As a result, we have found out that the error analysis was inaccurate as claimed by the writers of the Comment, but there is no typographical error in the Eq.(4) of our paper contrary to the claim of Kumar et al. In addition, the method of using equivalent Al target to estimate the additional excitation by 59.5-keV photons scattered from primary target is accurate.

Atıf için künye

Şimşek, Ö., & ERTUĞRUL, M. (2002). Reply to "Comment on 'Coster-Kronig L-shell yield f(23) of Dy, W, and Bi' ". PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 65(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.65.036502

BibTeX
@article{simsek2002-151208,
  author = {Şimşek, Önder and ERTUĞRUL, Mehmet},
  title = {Reply to "Comment on 'Coster-Kronig L-shell yield f(23) of Dy, W, and Bi' "},
  journal = {PHYSICAL REVIEW A},
  year = {2002},
  volume = {65},
  number = {3},
  issn = {1050-2947},
  doi = {10.1103/physreva.65.036502},
  url = {https://akademik.atauni.edu.tr/yayinlar/151208-reply-to-comment-on-coster-kronig-l-shell-yield-f23-of-dy-w-and-bi}
}