Comparison of the Effect of Pump Flow Type (Pulsatile or Non-Pulsatile) on Postoperative Neurocognitive Functions in Coronary Artery Surgery

Introduction: The effect of pump flow type on perfusion in coronary surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is discussed. We aimed to evaluate the effect of pump flow type on cognitive functions with neurocognitive function tests. Methods: One hundred patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between November 2020 and July 2021 were divided into two equal groups. Groups were formed according to pump flow type pulsatile (Group 1) and non-pulsatile (Group 2). Clock drawing test (CDT) and standardized mini mental test (SMMT) were performed on the patients in both groups in the preoperative period, on the 1st preoperative day, and on the day before discharge. Neurocognitive effects were compared with all follow-up parameters. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data and in terms of neurocognitive tests performed before the operation. SMMT on postoperative day 1 (Group I: 27.64 +/- 1.05; Group II: 24.44 +/- 1.64; P=0.001) and CDT (Group I: 5.4 +/- 0.54; Group II: 4 .66 +/- 0.52; P=0.001), and SMMT on the day before discharge (Group I: 27.92 +/- 1.16; Group II: 24.66 +/- 1.22; P=0.001) and CDT (Group I: 5 It was calculated as .66 +/- 0.48; Group II: 5.44 +/- 0.5; P=0.001). The duration of intensive care and hospitalization were higher in the non-pulsatile group. Conclusion: We think that the type of pump flow used in coronary artery bypass surgery using CPB is effective in terms of neurocognitive functions and that pulsatile flow makes positive contributions to this issue.

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Year

2024

Volume

39

Issue

5

ISSN

0102-7638

eISSN

1678-9741

DOI

10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0345

WoS UID

WOS:001420893700010