Comparison of unilateral and bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a prospective study

ObjectiveTo compare sperm retrieval rates between unilateral and bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) procedures in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and to contribute to the literature by comparing them with literature data.MethodsThis prospective study included 84 males with primary infertility who had azoospermic NOA, who had been married for at least one year, and whose female partners did not have a history of infertility. The study was conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. MD-TESE was applied bilaterally to 48% (n:41) (Group 1) and unilaterally to 52% (n:43) (Group 2) of the patients, and sperm retrieval rates were compared.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 patients and Group 2 patients in terms of sperm availability (61%, 56.5%, p=0.495, respectively). In addition, while no complications were observed in unilateral MD-TESEs, 3 complications were observed in bilateral MD-TESEs.ConclusionsIn our study, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of sperm availability in patients with NOA. Considering the operative time and complication rates of bilateral MD-TESE in patients diagnosed with NOA and the possible MD-TESE procedures that may be performed later, we believe that unilateral MD TESE is a more preferable procedure for the patient and surgeon in this patient group.

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY

Year

2023

Volume

55

Issue

9

Pages

2177-2182

ISSN

0301-1623

eISSN

1573-2584

DOI

10.1007/s11255-023-03668-0

WoS UID

WOS:001010041100002